When a Toronto-based tech firm needed to navigate one of the most complex acquisitions we'd seen in years, they came to us three weeks before their deadline. The deal involved IP transfers across three jurisdictions, messy shareholder disputes, and regulatory hurdles that could've killed the whole thing.
Commercial Litigation
Our client, a manufacturing company, got slapped with a massive lawsuit claiming they'd breached supply agreements. Thing is, they hadn't - the plaintiff was trying to wiggle out of their own obligations.
Corporate Governance
A financial services holding company was drowning in compliance chaos across eight subsidiaries. Different systems, contradictory policies, and audit nightmares waiting to happen.
IP Protection
Biotech startup needed to protect their breakthrough research before going to market. We're talking cutting-edge stuff with international implications.
Employment Law
High-stakes situation where a departing C-suite exec was about to join a direct competitor, potentially taking key clients and trade secrets.
M&A
Family-owned business wanted to cash out after 40 years but needed to protect legacy employees and brand integrity in the process.
Our client - let's call them TechVision Corp - had been negotiating to acquire a US-based SaaS company for months. Everything was moving along until their original legal team dropped the ball big time. With regulatory filings due in three weeks and shareholder votes already scheduled, they were in serious trouble.
The problems? Intellectual property assignments weren't properly documented, two minority shareholders were threatening to block the deal, and neither Canadian nor US regulators had received proper notifications. Oh, and the target company's employment contracts had non-compete clauses that would've been unenforceable post-acquisition.
"Nexurion Citadel didn't just save the deal - they made it better. What looked like a disaster turned into one of our smoothest acquisitions ever."
First thing we did was triage. We brought in our M&A team, an IP specialist, and someone who knew cross-border regulatory work inside and out. Day one, we had a war room set up and a clear timeline.
We negotiated directly with the dissenting shareholders - turned out they just wanted better terms and nobody'd bothered to ask. Got them on board within 48 hours with some creative earnout provisions.
For the regulatory stuff, we filed expedited notifications with both SEC and OSC simultaneously, something the previous counsel hadn't realized was possible. The IP issues took more finesse - we had to restructure how the tech transfer would work, but we found a way that actually gave our client better protection than the original plan.
Days to close (vs. 90 day industry avg)
Transaction value protected
Shareholder approval rate
In regulatory penalties or delays
Deal closed on schedule. Both companies' boards were happy. Regulators signed off without issues. And six months later, the integration's going smoothly because we made sure all the employment and IP stuff was buttoned up from day one.
Speed doesn't mean sloppy - With the right team and focus, you can move fast without cutting corners
Talk to stakeholders early - Most disputes aren't personal, they're just bad communication
Know the regulations - There's often more flexibility than people realize if you know where to look
These are just a few examples. Every case is different, every client has unique needs. But the approach stays the same - practical solutions, no nonsense, and results that matter.
The Situation: Manufacturing client got hit with a lawsuit claiming they'd breached supply agreements worth $47M. Plaintiff was actually trying to get out of a bad deal they'd made themselves.
What We Did: Dug through years of correspondence and found emails showing the plaintiff knew exactly what they were getting into. Built a counterclaim for attempted fraud that made them rethink their position pretty quickly.
Outcome: Case dismissed with prejudice. Client paid zero in settlement. Opposing counsel even had to cover our court costs. Client's still doing business with other suppliers who saw how we handled it.
The Situation: Financial services holding company with eight subsidiaries, each doing compliance their own way. Audit costs through the roof, constant risk of contradictory policies, and nobody could give the board a straight answer about their actual exposure.
What We Did: Spent six weeks mapping everything - policies, procedures, reporting lines, the whole mess. Then built a unified framework that actually made sense for how they operate. Trained their internal team to maintain it without needing us to hold their hand.
Outcome: Compliance costs down 40%. Zero regulatory violations in the 18 months since implementation. Board actually understands their risk profile now. Best part? Their internal counsel tells us they sleep better at night.
The Situation: Biotech startup with breakthrough research needed global protection before going to market. Competition was fierce, timelines were tight, and they'd already blown through one IP firm that didn't understand the science.
What We Did: Brought in specialists who actually got the technology. Filed strategic patents in 12 key markets simultaneously. Created a defensive publication strategy for stuff we didn't patent. Set up licensing frameworks for future partnerships.
Outcome: Complete portfolio protection valued at $125M. Successfully defended against two early challenges from competitors. Company went on to secure Series B funding at a significantly higher valuation because their IP was rock solid.
The Situation: C-suite executive leaving to join direct competitor. Non-compete in place but enforcement was questionable. Real worry was trade secrets and client relationships walking out the door.
What We Did: Skip the courtroom drama - those cases are expensive and unpredictable. Instead, we negotiated directly with the exec and their new employer. Found middle ground that protected our client's legitimate interests without being unreasonable.
Outcome: Confidential settlement that included modified non-compete terms, client protection agreements, and transition support. Both sides avoided litigation costs. Executive started their new role, our client kept their key relationships intact. Sometimes the best solution isn't the most aggressive one.
We've probably dealt